Template:Academic-written review: Difference between revisions
More actions
m 1 revision imported |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:18, 24 October 2024
 | The Error: Invalid time. version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Script error: No such module "delink". and can be cited as: Script error: No such module "template wrapper". |
Usage
This template is based off the Academic Peer Reviewed template and is meant for Wikipedia articles updated as part of a dual publication model used by journals to incentivize scholarly contributions to Wikipedia. Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the Wikipedia version to the community at large. <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"> Template:Top icon
 | The Error: Invalid time. version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Script error: No such module "delink". and can be cited as: Script error: No such module "template wrapper". |
</syntaxhighlight>
Example with QID
<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"> Template:Top icon
| The Error: Invalid time. version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Script error: No such module "delink". and can be cited as: Script error: No such module "Cite Q". |
</syntaxhighlight>
Produces: Template:Top icon
| The Error: Invalid time. version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Script error: No such module "delink". and can be cited as: Script error: No such module "Cite Q". |
Example without QID
<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"> Template:Top icon
| The 2016 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Script error: No such module "delink". and can be cited as: Script error: No such module "template wrapper". |
</syntaxhighlight>
Produces: Template:Top icon
| The 2016 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Script error: No such module "delink". and can be cited as: Script error: No such module "template wrapper". |
Caveats
Note that this template transcludes the Cite Journal Template, and inherits one of the weaknesses/issues of said template. The author list must be formatted in a certain way or it will give errors when using the {{{vauthors}}} parameter. If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with {{{vauthors}}}. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the {{{authors}}} instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a citation's metadata, and users consuming cs1|2 citations via the metadata will find that the citation is missing authors.
Categories for pages using these templates
- Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
- Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding articles published in Script error: No such module "delink".
See also
{{Academic peer reviewed}}- a similar template for articles, where content has been published in a peer reviewed journal{{External peer review}}- a similar template for articles reviewed externally but not full academic peer review